{"id":12255,"date":"2007-03-03T08:12:44","date_gmt":"2007-03-03T08:12:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.adobe.com\/jnackdev\/2007\/03\/converting-jpeg-to-dng.html"},"modified":"2007-03-03T08:12:44","modified_gmt":"2007-03-03T08:12:44","slug":"converting_jpeg_to_dng","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/2007\/03\/03\/converting_jpeg_to_dng\/","title":{"rendered":"Converting JPEG to DNG"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.adobe.com\/jnack\/2007\/02\/nondestructive.html\">discussing<\/a> non-destructive JPEG editing in Lightroom and Camera Raw, I mentioned that it&#8217;s possible to convert JPEG files into DNG&#8211;a format previously limited to raw data from camera sensors.&#160; Why do the new tools allow this, and why might it be useful?&#160; Here&#8217;s some perspective from Tom Hogarty: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s been almost a year since Lightroom introduced the ability to convert TIFF and JPEG files to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adobe.com\/products\/dng\/index.html\">Digital Negative (DNG)<\/a> format.  This does not mean that Adobe is magically converting output-referred TIFF\/JPEG files into mosaic data that has all of the flexibility of native raw files. These converted JPEG\/TIFF files are not raw files at all.\n<\/p>\n<p>So, why allow the conversion?<\/p>\n<p>As Lightroom and now Adobe Camera Raw provide non-destructive editing of JPEG and TIFF files, the DNG format offers benefits as a non-destructive editing format in addition to its position as a raw standard. <u>DNG is designed to efficiently store the XMP metadata block and image preview<\/u> associated with a non-destructive edit. As non-destructive editing capabilities grow, the DNG format has the architecture required to grow with those capabilities regardless of the source format. For example, a JPEG image converted to DNG and non-destructively edited three different ways will be able to store three sets of editing instructions and three distinct previews for each edit.<\/p>\n<p>Does this lessen DNG&#8217;s position as a raw format standard? Absolutely not. The core of public DNG specification is a standard method of storing and describing raw data. Most recently, Leica and Pentax have joined the ranks of camera manufacturers supporting DNG files natively and there are a substantial percentage of professional photographers converting their proprietary raw files to DNG for workflow or archival purposes. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So, editing a JPEG in Lightroom or ACR, then making it into a DNG, allows you to create an envelope that packages up the original bits, the editing sauce, and a rendered preview that any application can see (i.e. DNG = before + after + settings).&#160; And, unlike a regular JPEG that contains editing data, a DNG isn&#8217;t going to be mistaken for any old file.&#160; It stands out as something with special editing properties. <\/p>\n<p>Having said all this, converting JPEG to DNG is useful, but it&#8217;s not a panacea: it makes files larger (at least for now), and it&#8217;s not something I think everyone should run out and do.&#160; (I haven&#8217;t found a need to do it myself.)&#160; It&#8217;s an option, however, and one that could grow more useful in the future. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In discussing non-destructive JPEG editing in Lightroom and Camera Raw, I mentioned that it&#8217;s possible to convert JPEG files into DNG&#8211;a format previously limited to raw data from camera sensors.&#160; Why do the new tools allow this, and why might it be useful?&#160; Here&#8217;s some perspective from Tom Hogarty: It&#8217;s been almost a year since [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12255"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}