{"id":16504,"date":"2010-07-20T13:42:12","date_gmt":"2010-07-20T21:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.adobe.com\/jnack\/?p=2426"},"modified":"2010-07-20T13:42:12","modified_gmt":"2010-07-20T21:42:12","slug":"oily-photoshop-action-plus-ufos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/2010\/07\/20\/oily-photoshop-action-plus-ufos\/","title":{"rendered":"Oily Photoshop action (plus UFOs)"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li>BP has caught flak for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americablog.com\/2010\/07\/bp-photoshops-fake-photo-of-command.html\">digitally altering an image<\/a> of their crisis response HQ. \u00a0&#8220;&#8216;Normally we only use Photoshop for the typical purposes of color correction and cropping,&#8217; [a company spokesman] said in an e-mail. &#8216;In this case they copied and pasted three ROV screen images in the original photo over three screens that were not running video feeds at the time.'&#8221; [Via Noah Mittman]<\/li>\n<li>Meanwhile <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2010\/WORLD\/asiapcf\/07\/20\/china.ufo.debunked\/index.html\">UFOs over China<\/a> are being attributed to Photoshop work. \u00a0It&#8217;s kind of a weird, sloppy article, though: no details are given about how Photoshop (or anything else) could or did produce the video included on the page, and in any event what&#8217;s shown <em>is<\/em> a UFO (that is, an unidentified flying object); it&#8217;s just not necessarily an object of extraterrestrial origin. [Via Pete Falco]<\/li>\n<li>Update: There must be something in the water (no pun intended), as now the controversial action is <a href=\"http:\/\/photographyblog.dallasnews.com\/archives\/2010\/07\/now-you-see-him-now-you-dont.html\">spreading to golf<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BP has caught flak for digitally altering an image of their crisis response HQ. \u00a0&#8220;&#8216;Normally we only use Photoshop for the typical purposes of color correction and cropping,&#8217; [a company spokesman] said in an e-mail. &#8216;In this case they copied and pasted three ROV screen images in the original photo over three screens that were [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16504"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16504\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}