{"id":3918,"date":"2016-05-14T13:06:13","date_gmt":"2016-05-14T20:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/?p=3918"},"modified":"2017-03-30T16:31:09","modified_gmt":"2017-03-30T23:31:09","slug":"snapchat-photoshop-x-tenacious-d","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/2016\/05\/14\/snapchat-photoshop-x-tenacious-d\/","title":{"rendered":"Snapchat = Photoshop x Tenacious D"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Power to the people\u2014that\u2019s always been <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jnack\/status\/717848579440652289?lang=en\">my jam<\/a>. Instagram made photo <em>adjustment<\/em> mainstream. Now Snapchat is making photo <em>manipulation<\/em> mainstream.<\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t believe me? On May 5 alone, <strong>224 million<\/strong> people saw pictures of each other turned into taco-heads (below), each with a Taco Bell ad attached. Per <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adweek.com\/news\/technology\/taco-bells-cinco-de-mayo-snapchat-lens-was-viewed-224-million-times-171390\">AdWeek<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The average user played with Taco Bell&#8217;s ad for 24 seconds before sending it as a &#8220;snap.&#8221; In terms of unique plays\u2014or the number of times individual people interacted with the ad\u2014the campaign generated <strong>12.5 years&#8217; worth of play<\/strong> in a day.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Prior to that, on Super Bowl Sunday alone 165 million people saw images featuring a Gatorade dump. One can only guess how many swap faces, add masks, and share the results each day.<\/p>\n<p>It makes me think of absurdist rock duo <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tenacious_D\">Tenacious D<\/a>. Realizing that straight-faced metal can get only so hard (it eventually tops out with Norwegian cookie-monster vocals, etc.), they mastered that idiom, then busted right through the limits by making it <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/FjkiS5Us68I?t=1m44s\">insanely funny (and just insane)<\/a>. In the same way Snapchat combines <strong>technical excellence with a playful context<\/strong>. As a Taco Bell manager says,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;The content is expected to be lightweight and humorous, and the platform empowers you to be nimble and efficient in creation\u2026 That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not an artful craft, however.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u00a0Earlier this year I <a href=\"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/2016\/01\/08\/snapchat-who-gives-an-f\/\">wrote<\/a>,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The genius of Instagram was in helping regular people be better. The genius of Snapchat was in <strong>letting people not care<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u00a0But that undersells their accomplishment. <strong>Context<\/strong> (expectations) + <strong>Power<\/strong> catalyzes creative output.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s very easy to look down one\u2019s nose (\u201coh, it\u2019s not <em>really<\/em> creative, you can do just whatever they spoon-feed you, disposible \u2260 valuable\u201d) and not be wholly wrong. Yet Snapchat has gotten <em>hundreds of millions of people<\/em> creating, and at a visual level that otherwise would have been completely out of reach. And <em>that<\/em> is power to the people.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"TacOH.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/ITacOH.jpg\" alt=\"TacOH\" width=\"600\" height=\"550\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Power to the people\u2014that\u2019s always been my jam. Instagram made photo adjustment mainstream. Now Snapchat is making photo manipulation mainstream. Don\u2019t believe me? On May 5 alone, 224 million people saw pictures of each other turned into taco-heads (below), each with a Taco Bell ad attached. Per AdWeek: The average user played with Taco Bell&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2,6],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3918"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3918"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3918\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5256,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3918\/revisions\/5256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}