{"id":17181,"date":"2011-09-26T08:30:44","date_gmt":"2011-09-26T15:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.adobe.com\/jnack\/?p=5039"},"modified":"2011-09-26T08:30:44","modified_gmt":"2011-09-26T15:30:44","slug":"adobe-muse-improves-html-output-in-beta-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnack.com\/blog\/2011\/09\/26\/adobe-muse-improves-html-output-in-beta-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Adobe Muse improves HTML output in Beta 3"},"content":{"rendered":"

Adobe’s new “Muse” HTML authoring tool has attracted huge interest<\/a> & while stirring up controversy<\/a> about whether it’s possible for a visual tool to generate good code. Knowing that the team was working hard on improvements, I urged them to post details that might assuage concerns. \u00a0No, they said, let’s just do our jobs, then show the results.<\/p>\n

Now the team has posted Muse beta 3 for download<\/a> and has detailed the output-related improvements in this release<\/a>. “The primary focus of code improvements in Beta 3,” they write, “are around cross-browser compatibility and reducing page load times and data usage.” \u00a0Other improvements around SEO & accessibility are in the works.<\/p>\n

I think that people who care about high quality code output will be pleased with the progress, and I encourage you to give the team your candid feedback.<\/p>\n

[Via Terry White]<\/p>\n

Update: PM Dani Beaumont gives three minutes of perspective on the new release:
\n