I recently shared a really helpful video from Jesús Ramirez that showed practical uses for each model inside Photoshop (e.g. text editing via Flux). Now here’s a direct comparison from Colin Smith, highlighting these strengths:

• Flux: Realistic, detailed; doesn’t produce unwanted shifts in regions that should stay unchanged. Tends to maintain more of the original image, such as hair or background elements.
• Nano Banana: Smooth & pleasing (if sometimes a bit “Disney”); good at following complex prompts. May be better at removing objects.

These specific examples are great, but I continue to wish for more standardized evals that would help produce objective measures across models. I’m investigating the state of the art there. More to share soon, I hope!