The company has announced a new mode for their Canvas painting app that turns simple brushstrokes into 360 environment maps for use in 3D apps or Omniverse. Check out this quick preview:

Creative Reality Studio from D-ID (the folks behind the MyHeritage Deep Nostalgia tech that blew up a couple of years ago) can generate faces & scripts, then animate them. I find the results… interesting?

Artist & musician Ben Morin has been making some impressive pop-culture mashups, turning well-known characters into babies (using, I believe, Midjourney to combine a reference image with a prompt). Check out the results.

As I say, another day, another specialized application of algorithmic fine-tuning. Per Vice:

For $19, a service called PhotoAI will use 12-20 of your mediocre, poorly-lit selfies to generate a batch of fake photos specially tailored to the style or platform of your choosing. The results speak to an AI trend that seems to regularly jump the shark: A “LinkedIn” package will generate photos of you wearing a suit or business attire…

…while the “Tinder” setting promises to make you “the best you’ve ever looked”—which apparently means making you into an algorithmically beefed-up dudebro with sunglasses. 

Meanwhile, the quality of generated faces continues to improve at a blistering pace:

✨ Trained my own model for https://t.co/ll0YGEo53Z for more photorealistic renders called

`people-diffusion`

I think by this week I can deploy it!

🤖 These are all 100% AI-generated people

Skin finally has pores now but don’t look at the hands yet please 😂 pic.twitter.com/Y6wbPz3BSS

— @levelsio (@levelsio) November 21, 2022

The Doggfather recently shared a picture of himself (rendered presumably via some Stable Diffusion/DreamBooth personalization instance)…

…thus inducing fans to reply with their own variations (click tweet above to see the thread). Among the many fun Snoop Doggs (or is it Snoops Dogg?), I’m partial to Cyberpunk…

Cyberpunk Snoop Dogg, 1,2,3 or 4? pic.twitter.com/w8BgeJBx86

— Techietree.eth/tez (@techietree_eth) November 29, 2022

…and Yodogg:

Yodogg pic.twitter.com/9qqbluoCyt

— NIDO (@OfficialNID0) November 28, 2022

Another day, another special-purpose variant of AI image generation.

A couple of years ago, MyHeritage struck a chord with the world via Deep Nostalgia, an online app that could animate the faces of one’s long-lost ancestors. In reality it could animate just about any face in a photo, but I give them tons of credit for framing the tech in a really emotionally resonant way. It offered not a random capability, but rather a magical window into one’s roots.

Now the company is licensing tech from Astria, which itself builds on Stable Diffusion & Google Research’s DreamBooth paper. Check it out:

Interestingly (perhaps only to me), it’s been hard for MyHeritage to sustain the kind of buzz generated by Deep Nostalgia. They later introduced the much more ambitious DeepStory, which lets you literally put words in your ancestors’ mouths. That seems not to have bent the overall needle in awareness, at least in the way that the earlier offering did. Let’s see how portrait generation fares.

Speaking of Bilawal, and in the vein of the PetPortrait.ai service I mentioned last week, here’s a fun little video in which he’s trained an AI model to create images of his mom’s dog. “Oreo lookin’ FESTIVE in that sweater, yo!” 🥰 I can only imagine that this kind of thing will become mainstream quickly.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Billyfx (@billyfx.ig)

I’m not sure whom to credit with this impressive work (found here), nor how exactly they made it, but—like the bespoke pet portraits site I shared yesterday—I expect to see an explosion in such purpose-oriented applications of AI imaging:

We’re at just the start of what I expect to be an explosion of hyper-specific offerings powered by AI.

For $24, PetPortrait.ai offers “40 high resolution, beautiful, one-of-a-kind portraits of your pets in a variety of styles.” They say it takes 4-6 hours and requires the following input:

• ~10 portrait photos of their face
• ~5 photos from different angles of their head and chest
• ~5 full-body photos

It’ll be interesting to see what kind of traction this gets. The service Turn Me Royal offers more human-made offerings in a similar vein, and we delighted our son by commissioning this doge-as-Venetian-doge portrait (via an artist on Etsy) a couple of years ago:

I’ve tried it & it’s pretty slick. These guys are cooking with gas! (Also, how utterly insane would this have been to see even six months ago?! What a year, what a world.)

The Corridor Crew has been banging on Stable Diffusion & Google’s new DreamBooth tech (see previous) that enables training the model to understand a specific concept—e.g. one person’s face. Here they’ve trained it using a few photos of team member Sam Gorski, then inserted him into various genres:

From there they trained up models for various guys at the shop, then created an illustrated fantasy narrative. Just totally incredible, and their sheer exuberance makes the making-of pretty entertaining:

The makers of this new search engine say they’re already serving more than 200,000 images/day & growing rapidly. Per this article, “It’s a massive collection of over 5 million Stable Diffusion images including its text prompts.” Just get ready to see some… interesting art (?). 🙃

Lovely work from Glenn Marshall & friends:

“Shoon is a recently released side scrolling shmup,” says Vice, “that is fairly unremarkable, except for one quirk: it’s made entirely with art created by Midjourney, an AI system that generates images from text prompts written by users.’ Check out the results:

Meanwhile my friend Bilawal is putting generative imaging to work in creating viral VFX:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Billy3d (@billyfx.ig)

Trippy!

A bit behind the scenes:

Magdalena Bay has shared a new Felix Geen directed video for “Dreamcatching.” The clip, multi-dimensional explored through cutting-edge AI technology and GAN artwork, combined with VQGAN+CLIP, is a technique that utilizes a collection of neural networks that work in unison to generate images based on input text and/or images.

I don’t know much about these folks, but I’m excited to see that they’re working to integrate Stable Diffusion into Photoshop:

You can add your name to the waitlist via their site. Meanwhile here’s another exploration of SD + Photoshop:

See, isn’t that a more seductive title than “Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion“? 😌 But the so-titled paper seems really important in helping generative models like DALL•E to become much more precise. The team writes:

We ask: how can we use language-guided models to turn our cat into a painting, or imagine a new product based on our favorite toy? Here we present a simple approach that allows such creative freedom.

Using only 3-5 images of a user-provided concept, like an object or a style, we learn to represent it through new “words” in the embedding space of a frozen text-to-image model. These “words” can be composed into natural language sentences, guiding personalized creation in an intuitive way.

Check out the kind of thing it yields:

Many years ago (nearly 10!), when I was in the thick of making up bedtime stories every night, I wished aloud for an app that would help do the following:

• Record you telling your kids bedtime stories (maybe after prompting you just before bedtime)
• Transcribe the text
• Organize the sound & text files (into a book, journal, and/or timeline layout)
• Add photos, illustrations, and links.
• Share from the journal to a blog, Tumblr, etc.

I was never in a position to build it, but seeing this fusion of kid art + AI makes me hope again:

With #stablediffusion img2img, I can help bring my 4yr old’s sketches to life.

Baby and daddy ice cream robot monsters having a fun day at the beach. 😍#AiArtwork pic.twitter.com/I7NDxIfWBF

— PH AI (@fofrAI) August 23, 2022

So here’s my tweet-length PRD:

• Record parents’/kids’ voices.
• Transcribe as a journal.
• Enable scribbling.
• Synthesize images on demand.

On behalf of parents & caregivers everywhere, come on, world—LFG! 😛

Happy Monday. 😌

[Via Dave Dobish]

I mentioned Meta Research’s DALL•E-like Make-A-Scene tech when it debuted recently, but I couldn’t directly share their short overview vid. Here’s a quick look at how various artists have been putting the system to work, notably via hand-drawn cues that guide image synthesis:

This new tech from Facebook Meta one-ups DALL•E et al by offering more localized control over where elements are placed:

The team writes,

We found that the image generated from both text and sketch was almost always (99.54 percent of the time) rated as better aligned with the original sketch. It was often (66.3 percent of the time) more aligned with the text prompt too. This demonstrates that Make-A-Scene generations are indeed faithful to a person’s vision communicated via the sketch.

I swear to God, stuff like this makes me legitimately feel like I’m having a stroke:

And that example, curiously, seems way more technically & aesthetically sophisticated than the bulk of what I see coming from the “NFT art” world. I really enjoyed this explication of why so much of such content seems like cynical horseshit—sometimes even literally:

Researchers at NVIDIA & Case Western Reserve University have developed an algorithm that can distinguish different painters’ brush strokes “at the bristle level”:

Extracting topographical data from a surface with an optical profiler, the researchers scanned 12 paintings of the same scene, painted with identical materials, but by four different artists. Sampling small square patches of the art, approximately 5 to 15 mm, the optical profiler detects and logs minute changes on a surface, which can be attributed to how someone holds and uses a paintbrush. 

They then trained an ensemble of convolutional neural networks to find patterns in the small patches, sampling between 160 to 1,440 patches for each of the artists. Using NVIDIA GPUs with cuDNN-accelerated deep learning frameworks, the algorithm matches the samples back to a single painter.

The team tested the algorithm against 180 patches of an artist’s painting, matching the samples back to a painter at about 95% accuracy. 

Possibly my #1 reason to want to return to in-person work: getting to use apps like this (see previous overview) on a suitably configured workstation (which I lack at home).