tl;dr: In text apps just as in photos & video, limiting choice gets more people across the goal line.
Lately I’ve had text-upon-image apps on the brain. Notegraphy promises “beautifully designed writing;” Pictual offers to “turn your words into visual statements; and Overgram can “add beautiful typography to your Instagram photos.” They’re all nicely done, but how many people have cared?
Compare that to the highly popular Secret (current $40M valuation) and Whisper ($24M in funding). Both share captioned images anonymously. Secret only lets you set text (no control over font or positioning), then use a colored background or image. Whisper looks at your text & offers matching images, then offers a rudimentary set of fonts & the ability to slide a text block.
In both cases the essence is to make something that you’ll want to share, without giving you enough creative options that you’ll get lost en route to doing so. You can’t go too far wrong or be judged for not getting the look “right.” Immediacy whomps visual control. It’s Instagram all over again.
By the way, speaking of fun text/image projects, Nathan Ripperger makes fun art from the weird things his kids say. To help parents do something similar, JibJab has released Kid Quoter, but I haven’t seen it take off. See also Linzie Hunter’s Spam One-Liners, “a gorgeous, colorful set of hand-lettering based on spam email subject lines in Linzie’s inbox.”
John,
Found this:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/03/18/290234154/weekly-innovation-paper-notebooks-that-become-digital-files
just before the daily dose of Nackblog today …
p.s. is there a “Trace” command out there in graphic-software-land that could be used in conjunction with the upcoming OCR in this: http://modnotebooks.com?
… and a very east coast perspective (from the New York Times, resenting secrecies …?): http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/19/technology/new-social-app-has-juicy-posts-but-no-names.html